From bottleneck to efficient system: process, data, and software aligned.
Digital transformation, legacy modernization, and transformation recovery get treated as the same problem — they aren't, and most failures start with that mix-up. Before I touch a tool or a rewrite, I look at whether the process is actually standardized, the data is governed well enough to build on, and the team is ready for what's coming. Most breakdowns trace back to process and data, not technology, which is why fixing them in that order is usually faster and cheaper than starting over.
Cut per-project delivery losses within six months through process redesign and accountability structures.
An honest audit of your existing system — codebase, infrastructure, architecture, and security — with a clear picture of what's solid and what isn't.
A deep look at the processes running your business today — where they slow you down, where they break, and where they're quietly costing you.
Once we know what's broken and it's worth fixing, this is where I stay embedded to actually rebuild it — systems and process together, as an ongoing engagement.
From $6,000, delivered in 2–3 weeks on a 50-50 payment plan. The final price depends on the number of systems, compliance scope, and integrations.
The audit looks at your system: codebase, infrastructure, architecture, scalability, and security and compliance gaps. The operations analysis looks at the processes around it: workflows, bottlenecks, tooling, and data flow and reporting gaps, and ends in a prioritized action plan. It starts from $8,000 and takes 3–6 weeks, on a 50-50 payment plan.
No, each stands on its own. If you start with the audit, 30% of its fee is credited toward an Operations Analysis if you sign within 30 days.
An ongoing, embedded engagement to rebuild what the audit or analysis found, systems and process together: roadmap execution, team oversight, KPI tracking, and vendor management. It's a monthly retainer, billed monthly in advance, with a 3-month minimum, priced by days per week and scope, and typically follows a Technical Health Audit and/or Operations Analysis.
Because most breakdowns trace back to process and data, not technology. Fixing them in that order is usually faster and cheaper than starting over, and it keeps a new tool or rewrite from inheriting the same problems.